« March 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

April 25, 2007

Bic pen confessions

I think I appreciate the coffee, donuts, and books of Shepherd's Conference much more than I do the annual pastor's gift, this year being a fine fountain pen. Well, in retrospect, the humorous riff the guy gave (this year) about the fountain pen was worth getting the pen, I suppose.

One of the speakers from last year's 2006 Shepherd's Conference waxed eloquent on the joys of writing notes to your congregation with a fountain pen (ball-point or flair-tips don't count), and the wonderful rewards that would accrue in heaven; only, he was serious. He actually went on and on in this vein, causing me to feel from the mere volume of his words on the subject that there might actually be something to this. I am glad no one has me on tapes distributed all around the country, saying such silly things. Then again, it might be gratifying to think that what I said was of sufficient importance to be distributed around the country, silly statements not withstanding. But I digress.

My experience has been different, re: said fountain pen.

As I TYPE this (not, 'write this' - the distinction is important) my fingers are smudged with ink from desperate attempts to make my 2007 Shepherd's Conference fine writing instrument write.

There is a history here. Several weeks ago, the church got a large ($7000) gift from an out-of-state donor. I decided, having been influenced by Johnny Mac's preachers, that the only appropriate response would be a thank-you note, written, of course, using the Conference Fountain Pen. With fear and trembling, plus due reverence, I got my pen out and gingerly inserted the ink cartridge, played with the pen for a moment, finally managing to get the ink to the tip of the pen. And all this without a stray drop on hands, pants, or thank-you card! It was a good start.

Feeling that I was standing in the tradition of Jonathan Edwards and John Calvin, I composed a genuinely thankful thank-you note, which sentiments I recorded using my new fountain pen. This of course, using a sticky note gently placed over the still drying ink as I penned my sentences. If you are left-handed, you'll get it. Right-handers won't. For your edification, righties, I will point out that we lefties, as we write, are constantly moving our hands over what we have just written. Obviously, fountain pens were designed for the majority-world.

I did mange to get the note written without smears, nor too much ink on the bottom side of my pinky. As I sat back, enveloped in the satisfaction that can only come from having participated in such an ancient and spiritual tradition, I examined my handiwork.

Perhaps someone should have told me that the only people qualified to attain this level of pastoral prodigiousness are those who have mastered the art of penmanship. My note looked scratchy and scrawly, perhaps like something an eighth grader would write in a hurry. The jots and tittles displayed an uneven ink flow, sometimes disappearing entirely. On the whole, the piece was illegible. In fact, I would not have even known the language was English, were I not the author.

Sighing at this one more example of pastoral incompetence, I gutted it out and addressed the envelope, managing to attain the same ugly look. "It's the thought that counts," I told myself, as I dropped my masterpiece in the mail.

Now this might have been the end of the tale, had not something occurred to rub salt in the wound. Yesterday my thank-you note came back, undeliverable. Our generous donor had moved.

Not wanting to waste my sole effort of pastoring in the vein of Richard Baxter and John Bunyan, I determined to pen a fresh envelope - with the fountain pen. A little quick work with email secured the correct address.

Once more, overcome by an appropriate sense of awe and reverence, I took up my fountain pen - not used since this note was originally penned several weeks ago. But it would not write. No amount of shaking, tapping, scribbling on scrap paper, nor moistening the tip could convince the ink to flow. Anywhere, but on my fingers, that is.

Confession is good for the soul. I finished the new envelope with a crass, ball-point pen. No more fountain pens. And so, my brothers, I have come to the conclusion that I shall never attain to the spiritual stature of the Westminster divines. And all because of one, lousy, fountain pen.

April 13, 2007

Knowing Christ

 

Knowing and doing: there has always been a tension here. Not because there is any inherent contradiction between them, nor because of any mutual exclusivity. I'd like to suggest that not only are these not polar opposites, but they are symbiotic emphases. Knowing God and serving God in practical ways are in fact complementary. The one is not possible without the other, although one is clearly preeminent. The problem is one of emphasis.

The epistle of James has several of the classic statements on the necessary relation between truly knowing, and rightly doing: "But prove yourselves doers of the word, and not merely hearers who delude themselves" James 1:22 (NASB). "Therefore, to one who knows the right thing to do, and does not do it, to him it is sin" James 4:17 (NASB).

In the gospel of John, Jesus inextricably links the two: "Jesus therefore answered them, and said, 'My teaching is not Mine, but His who sent Me. If any man is willing to do His will, he shall know of the teaching, whether it is of God, or whether I speak from Myself'" John 7:16-17 (NASB).

It is clear the Scriptures teach that where there is no "doing," there is neither true "knowing." But it is also clear from the Scriptures that no tension exists between the two. As sinful men we tend to put forward false dichotomies in an effort to make our favorite points in an argument. But there is not dichotomy here. There is, however, priority and that priority is knowing God rightly and truly.

This is evident from several lines of thought. First, in our flesh dwells nothing good (Romans 7:18). No deed pleasing to God is possible apart from a proper saving faith in God (Hebrews 11:6). Only as redeemed individuals are we indwelt with the Holy Spirit, and only by the power of the Spirit are we able to serve God in such a way that is pleasing to Him (see the discussion in Romans 8, particularly verses 5-13). So it is clear, knowing God rightly precedes serving Him rightly.

Second, knowing God rightly is necessary in order for us to know what pleases God. In Ephesians 5 where Paul instructs the reader to walk as children of light, he emphasizes that part of our walking in light consists of "trying to learn what is pleasing to the Lord" (Eph 5:10, NASB). Again, in Colossians 1:9-10, Paul prays for the Colossians to know God's will that they may bear fruit that pleases Him.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, doing in its proper motivation arises out of the overflow of knowing. My acceptable service to God, whether that service takes the form of serving God directly or serving man in the Name of God, arises out of the fact that I am consumed by His Majesty, His Holiness, His Love, His Forgiveness, His Graciousness and Mercy, His utter claim of Lordship over not just the Cosmos, but over me. Notice the telling passage of Luke 10:38-42, where Martha gets stuck with the work of serving while Mary sits at the feet of Jesus. It is not coincidental that the priority in this text is given to Mary's desire to know Christ, over Martha's commitment to serve. Note that Martha's serving left her somewhat resentful, certainly not filled with peace and joy.

The gospels have long been recognized as portraits of Christ. It is notable that far more of the material in them is devoted to telling us about Jesus and Who He is, than about telling us what to do. It would be a complete mis-characterization to portray the gospels as not giving us our practical marching orders (such as in the Sermon on the Mount, or the parable of the Good Samaritan, or the Great Commission). Nonetheless, the vast bulk of the gospels are devoted to showing us God in Christ. Knowing Christ truly is the emphasis.

So what is a practical application of this priority of knowing over the also-important priority of doing? Certainly this, I think: biblical sermons should reflect the model provided by the gospels. Our priority in preaching should be portraiture rather than pragmatics. Our emphasis should be that Christians know Christ, in the sense of Paul's desire expressed in Philippians 3:10. We as preachers should explore the Scripture's presentation of Christ, even as Jesus Himself did on the Emmaus road in Luke 24:25-27. Then, Christians - people who truly know Christ - will not have to be cajoled to serve Him. We won't have to be pushed, pulled, and prodded. We will desire, out of the overflow of the wonderful knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ, to serve Him.

The reverse is definitely not true. Hoping that people will know the glory of Christ by driving them to serve Him is a vain hope. Christ must be preached. We must encourage our people to become Marys and know Christ, lest instead they become Marthas, serving Him and resenting it.


Hosting by Yahoo!